Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do the Right Thing (podcast)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:45, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Do the Right Thing (podcast)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Bgwhite with the following rationale "plenty of refs for this, including newspaper articles.". I'd like to see that "plenty of refs". The only one I see is the linked newspaper ref, which while from quality ref, is de facto just one paragraph-worth review of this podcast. I don't think that one paragraph review in an article, even in a reliable newspaper, is enough for the podcast to be notable. This doesn't meet neither the in-depth coverage requirement, nor one for multiple sources. As such, I can't agree this podcast is notable. PS. Ping User:RA0808 who nominated this for speedy before I prodded it. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Plenty of refs,, , , , , , and     The show won a Sony Award in 2012 for Best Internet Programme.  The Sony Award is the top award for British radio programming. It was also nominated for a Chortle Award.  I do not know if these satisfy WP:WEBCRIT.  The show will be filming a TV pilot this month.  Bgwhite (talk) 21:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG per a review of available sources. North America1000 15:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.