Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do you want to buy a duck?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.-- Hús  ö  nd  21:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Do you want to buy a duck?


Been Prodded, the PROD removed. A seeminlgy non-notable (and not that fun) word game or drinking game, probably one of many variations of a similarly-titled game. And Dumbot can finish the AFD listing, I can't be arsed to list it on the log now we've go 'bots to do the work for us Dangherous 08:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 19:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. N-n variation. Do I want to buy a duck? Do I f... no, I don't, thanks. Bubba hotep 23:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: I've played this game a good number of times, but I don't think it's sufficiently notable for a 'Kipedia article. Heimstern Läufer 23:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, and block Wikipedia from any future edits, forever. I think Wikipedia has pretty much all the information it could possibly need, once people resort to writing stuff like this--a parlour game which sounds about as fun as riding a bicycle without a seat.  Sheesh.  Wavy G 00:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash;Hanuman Das 01:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Then delete it again. Freshacconci 02:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I wouldn't be caught dead playing this game. Also, sue A for sexual harassment. --Wooty Woot? &#124; contribs 07:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If it walks like something made up in school one day, and talks like something made up in school one day, and quacks like... (you get the joke) -- RoninBK E TC 07:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC) Aflac!
 * A to B: Would you like to delete an article?
 * B to A: What's it about?
 * A to B: A circle game that is used as an icebreaker.
 * B to C: Would you like to delete an article?
 * C to B: Is it documented? Games don't belong in Wikipedia if they aren't documented.
 * B to A: Is it documented?
 * A to B: Yes, it's documented here.
 * B to C: No, it's not documented. Delete it per nom.
 * C to D: Would you like to delete an article?
 * D to C: Is it documented? Games don't belong in Wikipedia if they aren't documented.
 * C to B: Is it documented?
 * B to A: Is it documented?
 * A to B: Yes, it's documented here, too, on page 8. That's two.
 * B to C: No, it's not documented. Delete it per nom.
 * C to D: No, it's not documented. Delete it per nom.
 * D to E: Would you like to delete an article?
 * E to D: Is it documented? Games don't belong in Wikipedia if they aren't documented.
 * D to C: Is it documented?
 * C to B: Is it documented?
 * B to A: Is it documented?
 * A to B: Yes, it's documented here, too. Look, why don't you just put the name into Google Web?  You can find these and more.
 * B to C: No, it's not documented. Delete it per nom.
 * C to D: No, it's not documented. Delete it per nom.
 * D to E: No, it's not documented. Delete it per nom.
 * E to F: Would you like to delete an article?
 * F to E: Is it documented? Games don't belong in Wikipedia if they aren't documented.
 * E to D: Is it documented?
 * D to C: Is it documented?
 * C to B: Is it documented?
 * B to A: Is it documented?
 * A to B: Yes, it's documented here, too, and here, and here (on page 88), which is a handbook handed out to student supervisors at the University of Berkeley. This is a real game, and it's widely documented!
 * B to C: No, it's not documented. Delete it per nom.
 * C to D: No, it's not documented. Delete it per nom.
 * D to E: No, it's not documented. Delete it per nom.
 * E to F: No, it's not documented. Delete it per nom.
 * G: Keep. Uncle G 16:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The game dates back to at least 2002 and is cited at several websites about games. Edison 16:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom & the fact if we documented the existence of every petty game invented, all hell would break loose. --Sagaciousuk (talk) 17:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * We don't document the existence of every petty game invented. We don't document them on the grounds that they haven't already been documented, in multiple sources of good provenances, outside of Wikipedia.  WP:NFT explains this.  But we do include games that have already been documented outside of Wikipedia. Uncle G 01:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I appreciate the sense of humo(u)r in this AFD debate. --Dangherous 17:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 23:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.