Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dobson DaVanzo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Dobson DaVanzo

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't think it's quite a db-spam, and I can't db-org it since there are references and potential claims of significance, but I don't believe any of the references supports notability, and the 6 hits at Google archives don't help their case either. - Dank (push to talk) 00:31, 5 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 00:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 00:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't look to meet WP:ORG. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:19, 8 June 2009 (UTC).
 * Save, Allen Dobson and Joan DaVanzo have made significant contributions to critical analysis of the U.S. health care system with national and state health care policy determinations. They are well-recognized experts.  Major health care cost management and delivery system decisions will be made by the current federal administration and the public should have access to key studies to help understand the issues at stake. I'm in the process of adding more of the firm's studies to this page, and cross-referencing Wikipedia entries and additional studies in this area. Cankong (talk) 18:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Insufficient notability. Studies best included in appropriate article subjects rather than in this firm's article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not only is the topic non-notable, much is unverifiable self-promoting claims. Drawn Some (talk) 13:43, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.