Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doc-O-Matic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   shredded. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Doc-O-Matic

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm unable to find anything that shows notability. Joe Chill (talk) 20:21, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Did you look at the various results at Google Book search before nominating? There's a paragraph of coverage here and there by parties other than the company which markets the product. Edison (talk) 21:20, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Looking at this source, does just any piece of software get put in the book? I did consider this source, but I can't see all of it. I, personally do not think that a few paragraphs of cover show notability with not just these book sources, but a couple other ones that I found. Joe Chill (talk) 21:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete - No third-party mentions on Google and Yahoo aside from this Microsoft forum link, which I don't believe would apply as notable on Wikipedia. SwisterTwister  talk  04:49, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 00:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete no observable indication of notability  DGG ( talk ) 03:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.