Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dock to dish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 02:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Dock to dish

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a supposed certification program for seafood. There are no third-party references to this at all, other than self-generated Facebook and Twitter accounts. No established notability, either for the program or whichever entity is promoting it. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 02:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's some sort of fresh-caught seafood subscription service out of Montauk, Long Island. Other than a single sentence in Food & Wine, I could find nothing outside of social media. Not close to being notable, at least for now. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 15:51, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Whichever it is, it's not notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.