Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Arkeville


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of The Transformers characters. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:48, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Doctor Arkeville

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable fictional character - fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Claritas § 17:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪    ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  03:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom, no reliable sources for notability. Derild  49  21  ☼  17:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to a list of transformers characters per my arguments on the other AfD. Jclemens (talk) 23:38, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge per Jclemens Dondegroovily (talk) 04:12, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge into the G1 character list if the character is a reoccurring character, otherwise redirect to the episode list entry that the character appears in. —Farix (t &#124; c) 21:55, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Establishing notability - I just added a good third party book citation that should help establish notability. Mathewignash (talk) 22:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Now that notability is more established, I think it's a keeper. Mathewignash (talk) 22:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of The Transformers characters or something. An official guidebook is not a "third-party" publication, considering that Hasbro and such make profits from sales of those. I guess it could work as a reference, but not one that establishes notability. NotARealWord (talk) 03:01, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge for the sake of building a consensus. No third-party sources to WP:verify notability, although I admit the official guidebook used to make more money might be able to WP:verify a few facts. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge looks like the right call in this one. He could go in the decepticons article even if he's not actually a robot. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.