Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Claw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Inspector Gadget. (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  17:18, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Doctor Claw

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails WP:GNG. Not independently notable from Inspector Gadget; Google search does not result in significant coverage or reliable info. Article consisting of mostly in-universe information and trivia. Mostly copy & paste/cruft additions from tv show article. AldezD (talk) 17:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the Inspector Gadget article, no out-of-universe notability established. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Inspector Gadget, a search for independent coverage didn't yield anything significant to warrant a stand-alone article.Folken de Fanel (talk) 18:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. JJ98 (Talk) 19:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect - to Inspector Gadget per above. ö   Brambleberry   of   RiverClan  22:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Inspector Gadget, notability independent of the franchise not established. Although the article has a lot of stuff in it, there's not enough sourced content to warrant a merge.    15:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.