Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Moon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Comments calling for Keep were either completely implausible or explicitly contrary to notability guidelines, and have been discounted accordingly. RL0919 (talk) 12:31, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Doctor Moon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 11:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. This article successfully establishes notability.  --199.123.13.193 (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2019 (UTC) — 199.123.13.193 (talk) has made few or no other The edits outside this topic.     blocked sock Reyk YO! 13:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep and comment: As accordance with 199.123.13.193, I also chose this article as kept. Anyway, the Doctor Moon article sucessfully passes WP:NOTABILITY, and there is no reason to start a deletion discussion for this. The article may or may not have citations and reliable sources, but it should be kept just for the heck of it. --CentralTime301 01:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * So you're trolling and have no actual substance to add to the discussion? "Not a vote" and all that. TTN (talk) 13:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - Let this page stay. The other two contributors are right about their claim. --Rtkat3 (talk) 20:57, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I think you really need to read some of the policies and guidelines on fiction because pretty much every comment from you in AfDs is "let the page stay" while latching onto someone else's comment. See WP:N, WP:NOTPLOT, and WP:WAF. This isn't meant to be an insult at all, but I really think you'd be happier on a fan wiki. TTN (talk) 13:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * He has been a notable enemy of Batman and the Outsiders. If people want him merged, perhaps it can either be merged with List of minor DC Comics characters or List of DC Comics characters: C once it has been fully modified like how did with List of Marvel Comics characters: A. --Rtkat3 (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment: I respectfully disagree with the first two keep voters. The article in its current state only uses primary sources as its references. Per WP:GNG, there should be significant coverage about the topic in reliable sources. A stronger keep argument would point to evidence of this coverage. I think it is already pretty clear why CentralTime301's argument is not correct (i.e. "but it should be kept just for the heck of it."). Just wanted to point it out to anyone who looks at this. Aoba47 (talk) 04:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, or retarget to Silence in the Library. Googling reveals that the character who appears in that Doctor Who story is the more likely target. A Doctor Moon (comics) does not need to be created. The character makes few appearances across a variety of DC comics, so lacks a viable redirect, and individually fails WP:GNG. --Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 13:58, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * That Doctor Who character only appeared in that episode and the episode after that. --Rtkat3 (talk) 17:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yet is still the more likely search target. I'm not proposing an article on the character, just suggesting that the DC character is not the primary topic. --Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 07:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Pure fancruft defended by a sock and a banned editor (first two votes) and then by WP:PERX. Seriously, people... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:07, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Minor character that does not have much in the way of non-primary sources. The proposed target articles for merging are already huge, crufty messes themselves, and are evidence that not every single minor comic character needs to be covered.  Rorshacma (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.