Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Television Channel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Doctor Television Channel

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unable to find any secondary references for this defunct television network, which fails to meet WP:GNG as a result. Let&#39;srun (talk) 13:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America. Let&#39;srun (talk) 13:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Network's entire purpose was as non-notable filler while the owner waited for someone to buy a channel slot. I would weakly support a redirect, but I just can't see this really meriting an article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 16:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: It's hard to imagine a small television network like this, distributed via stations that, for the most part, have questionable notability themselves (if even that), getting the requisite significant coverage to merit an article. (To be sure, I don't think non-notability can be automatically assumed by association, much as actual notability is never inherited; all that matters is any coverage of a given topic.) When the "sourcing" for the network's demise is its silence on social media and an error message on its live stream…  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  23:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.