Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Thaddeus Venture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect. This close is based on the very similar Articles for deletion/H.E.L.P.eR. that I just closed. Even though there are no cited sources on the page for the content in question, because this is a main charater, I'm going with a soft redirect to List of The Venture Bros. characters. &mdash; Scientizzle 21:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Doctor Thaddeus Venture

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Clearly, this article does not have a real world coverage and citations, and does not meet the notability. JJ98 (Talk) 10:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Merge or Redirect to List of The Venture Bros. characters. The article in its current state is a major WP:PLOT fail, consisting of 99.9% plot summary (disguised as biography, relationships, etc.), but since this is the titular main character of the series in question I assume that some third-party sources probably exist from which the article could one day be improved. Certainly there is some real-world content that could be written (creation, inspiration, animation, voicing, etc.). But yeah, in its current state it's just plot rehash & ought to be redirected. --IllaZilla (talk) 18:11, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.