Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Who fandom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. SNOW impending. (non-admin closure)  Rcsprinter   (tell me stuff)  @ 21:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Doctor Who fandom

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of notability. Most references aren't actually reliable third-party sources but first-party fan-sites. Other references are not about the fandom but about individual fans. Fandom itself lacks notability. IsaacAA (talk) 23:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 September 9.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 01:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Whatever the faults of the current text, the subject is quite clearly notable. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:BEFORE.  Tons of potential sources, try for example . AfD is not cleanup.  --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:58, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep with a probability of SNOW - Well-documented fandom with depth of coverage and longevity. Orange Mike  &#x007C;  Talk  14:53, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.