Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor or engineer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as copyvio. Non-admin closure. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 03:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Doctor or engineer

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It looks like some fiction, moreover the topic is factious. Day000Walker (talk) 16:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Probably a Speedy candidate. Several Times (talk) 17:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my original PROD, WP:NOTESSAY. Karl 334  ☞ TALK to ME ☜  17:18, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete: An essay. SL93 (talk) 22:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Personal opinion masquerading as an article.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  01:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a blog. (I really wish there were a CSD criterion for this sort of thing.) –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 01:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I've tagged it for speedy delete as a copyright violation. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.