Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctrines and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep Merge debates can take place on the article Talk pages. Eluchil404 08:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Doctrines and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses

 * — (View AfD)

The article is a failed attempt to merge two other articles, Doctrines of Jehovah's Witnesses and Practices of Jehovah's Witnesses. The article is too long and is better for now left as two separate articles. Editing has continued as normal on the two other pages. BenC7 05:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tevildo 06:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is not that long (although the references section is), and it appears to be a well written article. TJ Spyke 06:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It looks to me like a successful merge of the other articles, and an attempt to separate doctrines and practices is not sound here.  It's not too long, and I think this material does belong in one place.--OinkOink 06:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just organize the references into columns. --Hemlock Martinis 11:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, everything looks perfect, just need to columnise the reference section. A good way of merging the articles imo. Terence Ong 16:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, extremely well-referenced article. Merger discussions should take place on the talk pages of the relavent pages.  AfD is not a mechanism for forcing people to merge or split articles the way you want. Tarinth 16:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I have just noticed that there is an almost identical page, Beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses. The content of this article will be merged into that one. BenC7 02:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, if there's consensus to do that. Philwelch 08:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems like a successful merge. Philwelch 08:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.