Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dodanthale Raja Maha Vihara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dial911 (talk) 00:08, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Dodanthale Raja Maha Vihara

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

found no significant independent and reliable source. Fails WP:GNG. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:GNG, thus notability. Quis separabit?  23:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: The temple is an archaeologically protected monument. Improved--L Manju (talk) 11:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, the page looks much improved after the nomination. Notability can not be an issue considering the age and archaeological status of the temple. SWR2.9 (talk) 08:42, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 02:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 02:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

UTC)
 * Keep clearly now satisfies WP:N - is an archaeological significant site. Dan arndt (talk) 10:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep It is an important temple and the article meets your policy. Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Dan arndt. Has notability due to archeological significance. Lacypaperclip (talk) 06:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, as listed place. --Doncram (talk) 22:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.