Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dodecagonal trapezohedron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Trapezohedron. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Dodecagonal trapezohedron

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't seem that notable. Better to delete or merge it into trapezohedron. Eridian314 (talk) 14:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Eridian314 (talk) 14:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge into Trapezohedron, as it seems that the dodecagonal one has no specific property compared to general trapezohedrons. In any case, if there are specific properties, they would be more visible there (by comparison with others trapezohedrons) than here. D.Lazard (talk) 16:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to trapezohedron, no merge. There are no special properties (or, more to the point, in depth sources) that would distinguish this from the other trapezohedra. Anything here that is not an immediate consequence of what's already in the trapezohedron article is original research, so no merge. This is only one of an enormous number of poorly sourced articles on specific polyhedra, tilings, polyhedral compounds, and higher dimensional analogues of those things (some of which are actually notable but in equally bad shape as this), so much more cleanup along these lines is needed. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to trapezohedron; there doesn't seem to be anything to merge. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.