Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dodger, Bonzo and the Rest (Dramarama Episode)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Dodger, Bonzo and the Rest (Dramarama Episode)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Declined PROD. Prod Reason was "Notability of stub article not demonstrated. Delete with no-redirect as the non-hat version is already occupied by the series that spawned from this and the Dramarama series already has a page." If you take the actor list and cast list out it's a barely managable stub that does not demonstrate it's need to be here Hasteur (talk) 02:47, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: This discussion should cover all the other stubs linked from Dramarama (TV series). Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:04, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm floating this AfD first to see the consensus regarding episodes of the series due to the fact that this is one of the few that spawned a spinoff series of it's own and therefore a good test case for batching the others up in the near future. I know it's a multi-step process, but it helps build a precedent on the other stub episodes. Hasteur (talk) 14:23, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I know. Just pointing this out to those who give their voice; I tend to think that all of them should go. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 14:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Additional Note The Synopsis section is a 100% copy of the reference. According to their Terms of Service it does not appear that we can use this. Hasteur (talk) 15:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence that this is notable in its own right. Favonian (talk) 16:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.