Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog.House (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Children of the Anachronistic Dynasty. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Dog.House (album)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No significant coverage. Fails WP:N. Since the band is only barely notable because of having had Maynard James Keenan as a member, their releases do not deserve individual articles. Conical Johnson (talk) 03:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:55, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per poor deletion rationale. WP:N is extremely expansive and most categories have their own rules on what is and isn't notable.  The rest of the rationale reads like Just Not Notable.  I will amend this vote if there are any relevant guidelines buried in the music wikiprojects that provide a clearer reason for lack of notability. McJeff (talk) 07:11, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Dog.House does not meet the basic notability requirement of having "been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable". Further, the group itself may not be notable, since its only claim to fame is having had Maynard James Keenan as a member, which does not satisfy "Is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles, or an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians". I was waiting to see the consensus on these albums before nominating the group itself for deletion, but perhaps I was wrong there. Conical Johnson (talk) 10:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * Merge All three of the albums are not notable on their own but should be included as part of the article on Children of the Anachronistic Dynasty. Children of the Anachronistic Dynasty should not be deleted, even though one of the criteria to make a group notable is "... an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians". " The group article on Children of the Anachronistic Dynasty should be kept because even though there is only one notable member because that member is especially notable and the subject of a featured article.Rcurtis5 (talk) 16:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.