Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DogHouse Systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 17:08, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

DogHouse Systems

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can' find reliable 3rd party reviews or other evidence to show notability. What I can find are lots of blog positings comparing it to Alienware.  DGG ( talk ) 14:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * delete A box-assembler has to do something pretty radical to make themselves noteworthy. There's no evidence of that here. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.