Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog Mountain (dog park)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow keep. (Non-admin closure).--Antigng (talk) 12:04, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Dog Mountain (dog park)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable park, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - has received enough coverage over the years —Мандичка YO 😜 22:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Joseph2302 ,why was this even nominated? The nom gives zero rationale as to why they think this topic "fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE" when soruces sources already in the article show it passes those guidelines.  I'm wondering if the nom even bothered looking at the already provided sources.  It even has national coverage from NPR.   A textbook example of why WP:BEFORE needs to be an absolute rule. --Oakshade (talk) 04:51, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Passes WP:GNG: NPR, The Washington Post, VPR, The Dog Lover's Guide to Travel. North America1000 20:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:10, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. RS coverage cited in the article plus RS articles found in searches satisfy WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH. This dog chapel/dog park/art gallery gets non-trivial coverage from media all over North America. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.