Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog daycare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Snow keep. Article has been cleanup addressing the deletion concerns. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  03:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Dog daycare

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Poorly written, largely unsourced article. Long tagged for improvement yet little has been done. Biker Biker (talk) 22:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - The actual subject is a valid one being that it's not boarding kennels and it's not pet sitting so sort of comes in-between. The current article though is abysmal and needs starting again from scratch, preferably by someone whose first language is English and doesn't have a case of the galloping CoI's. --The Pink Oboe (talk) 22:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep It's poor, it's trivial, but we've worse than this and basic notability does seem to have been achieved. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Clearly encyclopedic topic. Weakness of an article is not cause for deletion. Carrite (talk) 23:17, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Spam masquerading as an article. The one source to  Time does not  notability make per WP:ORG. I'm  sorry  to  disagree with  you Andy, but  WP:OTHERSTUFF etc. etc. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree with Carrite, I believe it is a relevant encyclopedic topic, however it needs massive cleanup and further information. i'll search for some good sources before making any changes though. Killemall22 (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Encyclopedic topic, but poor article. Taking a long time to improve is not a reason for deletion. Miyagawa   (talk)  13:16, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree that it is a relevant topic, different than a kennel, and will be useful to people once it is added to and made a better article. --MLKLewis (talk) 20:31, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep, most certainly encyclopedic, of educational value, and sufficient secondary source coverage. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 21:00, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - so rescue it! Bearian (talk) 21:14, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Real thing, ample coverage.  D r e a m Focus  08:25, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep Like --The Pink Oboe says, it's not kennels and not pet sitting. WP:NOTCLEANUP. CallawayRox (talk) 18:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have cleaned up this poopy article. Now I know a lot more about the rise of doggie daycare; these are the kinds of cultural trends that happen to us when we are not looking.--Milowent • hasspoken  14:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Great job Milo! CallawayRox (talk) 18:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.