Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog in Burley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfied per request. (non-admin closure) shoy (reactions) 17:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Dog in Burley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Totally unencyclopedic article about a specificmethod of carrying dogs. No sources, not notable. Also, WP:NOTMANUAL Fyddlestix (talk) 01:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note article has been moved to User:Madimyers/Dog in Burley. -- GB fan 00:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Fyddlestix beat me to creating the AfD. Delete - This is not an encyclopedia article. It is a how-to and had no place in the encyclopedia. I can not find any reliable sources that discuss talking your dog for a ride in a trailer behind a bicycle. -- GB fan 01:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Under WP:A7 if not WP:SNOW. This is not an encyclopedia article.  It's not even a how-to, more of an image board thing, to collect cute pictures. Fieari (talk) 01:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It is not an eligible subject for deletion under WP:A7. -- GB fan 01:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hm. You may be right.  I think I misread what the article was trying to be... it does self-assert notability after all.  Ugh.  I still think WP:SNOW is going to apply here. Fieari (talk) 02:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree with the other commenters. The article is unsourced and probably cannot be properly sourced. No sources have been found. It may not be advertising, but if not, it is very close to it. It is indeed more of an image board thing, totally unencyclopedic. Also, a minor point perhaps, it is not written in encyclopedic style or language. I was considering tagging it for speedy deletion on Huggle but I hesitated because no criterion seemed to fit exactly, I checked the page and saw the entry here so I add my comment. Donner60 (talk) 02:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would have thought it meets speedy delete criteria, but apparently not on a strict interpretation. It is clearly not encyclopaedic, un-verifiable and non-notable. There is already an article Burley Design about the company referred to here so if there was anything that could be verified from this article it should go there, not in a separate article. Melcous (talk)
 * Delete. It's true that dog's can be carried in bicycle trailers, but any discussion of their utility as transportation devices for pets should be discussed at that article per WP:PAGEDECIDE. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 08:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Written like an advert, likely COI. Also, WP:SNOW.  Jujutsuan  ( Please notify with &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; &#124; talk &#x7C; contribs) 11:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete Not to be seen as a bully (per the talk page), but this is clearly what Wikipedia is NOT for. The author of this page stated that this was designed to be more of a social media type page, and to give Wikipedia "Youtube based exposure". RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an encyclopedia, not a blog for pictures of dogs in bike trailers. This seems to qualify as SNOW. RA 0808  talkcontribs 18:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete – Not an encyclopedic article. Most of the images have been removed from Commons as copyviol. Mojoworker (talk) 18:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Is Incubate a valid !vote? While it's a mess as is, it's possible this could be developed into an article that meets GNG, as the editor learns Wikipedia policies. I hate to do something so dishearteningly BITEY as outright deletion to an enthusiastic new editor... Mojoworker (talk) 19:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Note article has been moved to User:Madimyers/Dog in Burley. -- GB fan 00:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.