Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog people


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  17:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Dog people
Originally deleted for patent nonsense. Listed for speedy deletion, but deletion tage was removed by author. Now listing for non-notable neologism. Wildthing61476 15:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a nn neologism. No evidence of the term on the first 3 pages of google. AdamBiswanger1 15:31, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and fix to the base of a fire hydrant per nom. Ravenswing 16:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -PresN 18:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism. Ruff. Danny Lilithborne 21:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable neologism, almost patent nonsense. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 03:15, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.