Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doggcrapp training


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kevin (talk) 23:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Doggcrapp training

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Per WP:GNG, this topic has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject in order to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. If anything this should be given a paragraph in the Strength Training article.  Quar te t  12:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. One article in FLEX from 2006 - other than that mostly covered on blogs and other self published media. Questionable notability - it's just one of many internet created training/diet systems (ie: Animalbolics).--Yankees76 (talk) 17:31, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete There doesn't seem to be any claim to notability (or any sources that establish it for that matter). B figura  (talk) 00:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bfigura above. (Also the article is written in a promotional non-encylcopedic style and good faith searches don't reveal the sources that would be needed to do a rewrite/fix.) - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:46, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.