Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DoggyRide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to bicycle trailer. Scott Mac (Doc) 11:57, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

DoggyRide

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable commercial product Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  02:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some references from reliable sources, which I think demonstrate notability. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk • contribs)  02:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk • contribs)  02:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Promotional. Doesn't say anything encyclopedic that's not in Bicycle trailer. EeepEeep (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 *  Delete  per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. The sources added by Eastmain (1 and 2), which are also the first two sources in the Google News Archive search, are insufficient because they provide only passing mentions (one sentence each) about DoggyRide. Cunard (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with the selective merge to bicycle trailer proposed by . Cunard (talk) 09:33, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge a little bit to bicycle trailer. Yes, you could probably find enough sources to argue for notability if that article didn't exist, but since it does a separate standalone article isn't warranted just because there is enough material to write it (see Articles for deletion/Michelle Obama's arms).  In particular, there's no need for an article on the brand DoggyRide when Bicycle dog trailer would cover the generics as well—but only highlights how silly it would be not to merge it with bicycle trailer.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 09:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article has been rewritten. - mattmontare (talk • contribs) 02:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for making the article less promotional; however, you have not addressed the notability issues. Has DoggyRide been the subject of nontrivial coverage in reliable sources? Cunard (talk) 07:17, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your feedback. DoggyRide has been subject to nontrivial coverage from various sources, which made the trademark a generic term in the Dutch language mattmontare (talk) 13:36, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Please provide links to the articles that provide nontrivial coverage about DoggyRide. Cunard (talk) 05:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for being persistent. Added several links mattmontare (talk) 15:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I am still not seeing enough significant coverage in reliable sources. This link doesn't appear to mention DoggyRide, but this review (from Bicycling.com which is published by Rodale, Inc.) is a good indicator of notability. If you can find one more source, I will switch to keep. At this moment, this debate looks like it will be closed as a merge/redirect. When you can find more sources, feel free to post them on my talk page so I can evaluate it and perhaps undo the redirect. Cunard (talk) 18:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge selectively with bicycle trailer. No significant coverage to indicate that it meets WP:PRODUCT. ukexpat (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.