Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogie Butte


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Dogie Butte

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GEOLAND on grounds fails: Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. CFCF  💌 📧 21:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: I have expanded the article beyond mere statistics. Note that WP:GEOLAND includes "mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc."– Gilliam (talk) 23:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, where there is information beyond statistics. There isn't here. An explanation of the name isn't sufficient. CFCF   💌 📧 07:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Harding County, South Dakota. GEOLAND is not satisfied by a definition of "dogie". Clarityfiend (talk) 02:48, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep -- The Anome (talk) 14:45, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - adequate sources, adequate content.  Montanabw (talk)  15:29, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Keep of course, and start an article on the nearby mountain named "Horse's arse".♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:44, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets notability for geographic features. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:58, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.