Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogpiss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  13:16, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Dogpiss

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This punk rock band appears likely to fail WP:N. The band released one album on a subsidiary label, so it's possible that the band just meets criteria #5 of WP:BAND, but this may not be enough to confer topic notability for a Wikipedia article. Source searches are only providing passing mentions from Google Books. Haven't found any coverage in Google News archive. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:52, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per nom's own words --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:27, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - Hi Sue. Thing is, though, is that WP:BAND, part of the Notability (music) guideline page, states that a topic "may be notable if it meets at least one of the following criteria", rather than that the topic is automatically notable if it meets at least one of the criteria. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:53, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * And one album is not multiple albums so it doesn't meet #5. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:54, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I cannot even find the books that Northamerica1000 alludes to. All that I can turn up are album listings on WWW sites.  The article cites no sources, and I am unable to find any.  Uncle G (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - Hello Uncle G. Here are the book sources I found from customized Google Books searches:, , . They're all passing mentions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The other two are just one line album listings, but the one in Maximum RockNRoll looks like a CD review. I presume that you have read it.  Is it mainly reviewer opinion and short on facts?  Uncle G (talk) 08:33, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete There is a two sentence review in Melody Maker (by Trevor Baker, 15 May 1999 in Volume 76, Issue 19; ISSN: 0025-9012). Nothing that adds up to significant coverage in multiple independent references. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Not notable, wikipedia doesn't care about oft garage bands.  –BuickCenturyDriver 23:42, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.