Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogs of War (history)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 12:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Dogs of War (history)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is a dictionary entry with very short context. WP:NOT Stoic atarian 09:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Little chance of ever turning into a "real" article. --Latebird 09:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- information on the titel should be included in the articles of those it was given too rather than a standalone article. Thunderwing 18:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletions.  -- Carom 17:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)


 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 08:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Cry Delete and let slip the dogs of war. This factlet doesn't seem to me to be notable enough to require its own article, and without attribution the information shouldn't be merged. -- Charlene 00:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Charlene sums it up best ... "this factlet doesn't seem to me to be notable enough to require its own article". So, delete per WP:WINAD. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 03:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as dicdef. The factoid is true, but it's already in the individual articles; nothing more need be done save for deletion.    Ravenswing  17:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.