Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dolem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mr.Z-man 23:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Dolem

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Well, my first AFD. In the process of cleaning up the Rahxephon pages, I can find no reason this should exist as a separate page. Almost all the entries are non notable and those that are can be easily integrated into the character page. Westrim (talk) 05:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

I should add that the intro has already been integrated into the main page. Westrim (talk) 05:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. VG &#x260E; 11:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Isn't List of RahXephon characters pretty long already? Might this article not live on as something along the lines of Technology of Rahxephon, or perhaps List of Dolem, something like this, similar to Angel (Neon Genesis Evangelion)? 208.245.87.2 (talk) 13:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: It's original research, excessive fancruft, and a granularity that is absolutely not supported by the importance of the series.  Utgard Loki (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 20:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, completley fails WP:N, WP:PLOT, and WP:WAF. No significant coverage of the Dolems from this series in reliable, third part coverage (unlike the aforementioned Angels of NGE). The brief summary of a Dolem in the main article is all that is needed, not this full list that seems to be guessing at far too much.-- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 20:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge to List of RahXephon characters. Unlike NGE, Dolem are not terribly notable. 70.51.8.158 (talk) 05:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * merge The question now is whether we want redirects from the individual names. I leave it to those who know the series. DGG (talk) 17:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.