Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dolní Poustevna railway station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) WJ94 (talk) 15:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Dolní Poustevna railway station

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Per WP:NTRAINSTATION; fails WP:GNG. An ordinary and unremarkable building. The timetable is not a sufficient reference and there are no others. FromCzech (talk) 12:08, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 12:08, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The station building was bigger than normal for a community this size because it was a border station with space for customs officials (originally Austria-Hungary, later Czechoslovakia and the Czech Republic). It has a long history (opened 1904). The article can be expanded with information from the corresponding article in the German Wikipedia at de:Bahnhof Dolní Poustevna, including this book reference: * Johannes Raddatz: Eisenbahn in der Sächsischen Schweiz, Band 4 Verlag Bernd Neddermeyer, Berlin 2012, ISBN 978-3-941712-20-1, S. 184–191 The Czech Wikipedia does not have a corresponding article on the station, but it does have articles on the community and the railway line. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep, per Eastmain, a border station is highly likely to be notable. There is also a Czech book which seems to discuss the reconstruction and reopening of the line. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 16:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep In addition to the above sources, there are another 2 online news articles describing the sale of the station building:
 * - This article also contains a backgrounder to the historical usage of the station building
 * Jumpytoo Talk 19:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Jumpytoo Talk 19:35, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Coverage sufficient to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources provided, Meets GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as that this meets the WP:GNG. WP:SNOW also applies! gidonb (talk) 02:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep needs improvement but looks like the sources exist to pass WP:GNG KylieTastic (talk) 15:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Hopefully the article will be expanded with material from German Wikipedia and other sources noted in this AfD. References found look sufficient to achieve notability under the GNG. Rupples (talk) 01:15, 5 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.