Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dolphin parenting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Parenting_styles. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 05:30, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Dolphin parenting

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be a WP:NEO coined by either Shimi Kang or Shawn Achor a couple of years ago (the article has been edited back and forth to credit just one of them), with all sources being books or interviews from one or the other of those two people. Not seeing any sources demonstrating wider adoption. McGeddon (talk) 20:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, as it has very questionable notability. I could find only Parental investment and Parental care in birds, so I guess it is not worth of doing a redirect either. Ceosad (talk) 23:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The article has been previously redirected to Parenting styles where it has a short paragraph. --McGeddon (talk) 11:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I missed that. It would be a good place for a redirect. Ceosad (talk) 15:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Maybe others out there are doing similar work, but it looks like only one author and book talk about this research. Maybe the information is important enough to include somewhere, but I don't think a full page is doing anything but promoting a not widely researched idea. The 'News response' links could be used to discuss on Parenting styles as mentioned above. Tangledupinbleu chs (talk) 04:05, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Parenting styles. clpo13(talk) 04:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.