Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dom&nic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Dom and Nic. Courcelles 21:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Dom&nic

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD declined by creator without  adding  references. Concern = Unreferenced. No sources found to support claims of notability or awards. Does not meet criteria at WP:ORG Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:45, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 18:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Does not meet WP:ORG criteria → Σ ⚑   ☭  07:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: There also exists Dom and Nic, an article dating back to 2007. --GuillaumeTell 00:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to Dom and Nic (an article which exists since 20 Feb 2007) References have now been added to Dom&nic -- Marek  .  69   talk  03:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment - I  was not  aware of the existence of the other article when I  nominated this. After a discussion  with  the creator I  think merging Dom&nic to  the original  article is the most  appropriate solution. Without  prejudice to  the fact  that   Dom and Nic may  come under review. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect; consider AfD for Dom and Nic separately. --Orangemike (talk) 16:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.