Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dom4j


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:48, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Dom4j

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep based on Google books and Google scholar hits. One of the most popular Java XML libraries, included in endless number of software products. --ElComandanteChe (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm surprised to vote to keep.  I'm usually a deletionist and my initial impression was this was another wikicruft WP:CATALOG article.  I didn't find anything useful from a simple Google search.  But I agree with ElComandanteChe that Google books returns mentions that, if added to the article, would certainly establish notability.  The fact they aren't yet cited isn't a reason to delete.  Msnicki (talk) 19:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.