Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dom Marcell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Dom Marcell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is submitted on behalf of the subject who desires not to have an article. There may also be notability concerns, currently indicated on the page.

I may participate below but this nomination is not a statement of my own views (though closers of course should consider it as part of the individual's) Nosebagbear (talk) 08:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Nosebagbear (talk) 08:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article is referenced with reliable sources and I don't believe we should be removing articles because the subject doesn't like seeing information in search results; as long as it is factual and unbiased. Ifnord (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 22:11, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 22:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as there is not enough notability to override the subject's request for deletion. He has only released three singles with no albums so he is not really established yet, in my view Atlantic306 (talk) 23:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly there is no reason to keep this article when the subject wants it gone. Clearly not notable enough to mean we absolutely need an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.