Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (extinction)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. (WP:SNOW) -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:32, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Dominant group (extinction)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Another Dominantgroupcruft WP:SYNTH violation, none of the sources join Dominant group and the topic together. Cerejota (talk) 04:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  —202.124.73.100 (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:OR by WP:SYNTH. Searching does not suggest this combination of terms is a notable topic. -- 202.124.73.100 (talk) 05:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is not a topic, it's someone using a search engine to find the phrase "dominant group" and tossing a lot of unrelated stuff into an article. As in the moon one, the first example is actually an incorrect parse, so it wouldn't belong even if this were a thing. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 06:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:37, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is pure WP:SYNTH-by-Google (and not especially coherent).  Sławomir Biały  (talk) 21:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:SNOW. OR. Glrx (talk) 22:41, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - "dominant group" is a phrase in the English language that has its normal meaning; it is not a special concept in relation to extinction. Lady  of  Shalott  04:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all as pure synth, someone needs to alert User:Marshallsumter to stop creating these article unless he has some real content. his user page lists dozens more on the way.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bollocks, synthesis, and original research. Binksternet (talk) 22:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per AN/I thread, SYNTH article created for strange 'research' project  Jebus989 ✰ 14:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.