Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (stars)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. (WP:SNOW) -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:10, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Dominant group (stars)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Another Dominantgroupcruft WP:SYNTH violation, none of the sources join Dominant group and the topic together. Cerejota (talk) 04:55, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  —202.124.73.100 (talk) 05:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:OR by WP:SYNTH. Searching does not suggest this combination of terms is a notable topic. -- 202.124.73.100 (talk) 05:06, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is not a topic, it's someone using a search engine to find the phrase "dominant group" and tossing a lot of unrelated stuff into an article. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 06:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Incoherent OR.  I strongly feel we are being trolled and that the matter should proceed to ANI.  These new articles are clearly disruptive.   Sławomir Biały  (talk) 20:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:SNOW. OR. Glrx (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - "dominant group" is just a phrase in the English language; it is not a special concept in relation to stars. Lady  of  Shalott  04:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOR.AstroCog (talk) 21:07, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete- clearly a lot of original research and novel synthesis. Wikipedia is not for presenting your new ideas and classifications. Reyk  YO!  21:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Incoherent rambling. Binksternet (talk) 23:09, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per AN/I thread, SYNTH article created for strange 'research' project  Jebus989 ✰ 14:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.