Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominate Game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 21:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Dominate Game

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This game has no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, so this fails the general notability guideline. Prod was contested, so here we are. MrOllie (talk) 00:14, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I would argue to delete as per the reasons which you stated. Quærens talk / contributions 00:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)


 * delete as non notable. Hobartimus (talk) 10:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: No way is this notable. Joe Chill (talk) 19:22, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hold: it may or may not be notable on it's own; however, in the larger context of the Risk (clone) article and the collection of notable clones, it is worthy of mention.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riitoken (talk • contribs) 20:26, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. See also Articles for deletion/Risk (clone) andy (talk) 15:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Snotty Wong   communicate 23:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability whatsoever. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, as above. Also Category: Risk (clone) should be deleted too. 2005 (talk) 01:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete not even a token attempt at asserting notability. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, software with no sourceable evidence of notability. -- Kinu t /c  02:52, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources. It is simply listed in directories. -- Whpq (talk) 15:12, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.