Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domination Homes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Domination Homes

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable building company, one of presumably a few hundred in Perth. Entry appears to be blatant advertising. A finalist for a local building award hardly makes this encyclopaedic. –Moondyne 11:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:55, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * delete - no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 16:23, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the lack of reliable sources. I have been unable to find any coverage about this company in Google News Archive and Google Books. Cunard (talk) 02:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete being a finalist for that award is not notable. Clubmarx (talk) 18:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.