Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domingo Pilarte


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is the article needs cleanup and improvement, not deletion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  09:53, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Domingo Pilarte

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BLP HeinzMaster (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. HeinzMaster (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. HeinzMaster (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. HeinzMaster (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment the newspaper articles listed in the article look promising but are not linked. Also for source searchers please note that there is a high profile MMA fighter of the same name, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:42, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep -- He looks to me as if he was a significant itinerant healing evangelist. No doubt the newspaper articles only represnet a sample of his work.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject looks notable to me but lack of online references and that is obvious in 1950s and 60s there is no trending internet. GermanKity (talk) 02:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above, seems to notable at a particular point. Grandruskiy48  • Talk∕Contribs 16:41, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Terrible article but the consideration here is notability. I moved the general references from the "External links". I fear the "inline citation" tag, that already has reached career status (since September 2010), will be a permanent fixture. --  Otr500 (talk) 02:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.