Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic McGiveron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Dominic McGiveron

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not clear on what basis McGiveron qualifies for an article. He has only played for amateur clubs in England and at a very, very low level of the footballing pyramid in the USA, Finland, Norway and Sweden. None of the sources qualify for WP:GNG and I could find nothing better myself. Source analysis to follow. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Source assessment Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:42, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)


 * delete The source assessment table is quite clear. No clear indication of passing WP:GNG. All these fhese footballers need to start their own website and post their bios there. Ode+Joy (talk) 20:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. I notice that the creator was called Tiffanydom and she only ever made four edits, all to this article about someone called Dominic. Perhaps Tiffany had a personal interest in Dom, ha! No Great Shaker (talk) 12:25, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Well spotted! I'm surprised that Tiffany didn't take the opportunity to mention herself in the article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete – per all above, and most helpfully the source assessment table from nom. Fails GNG and NFOOTY. Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.