Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominica at the 2010 Commonwealth Games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. After several weeks, a consensus for deletion has formed (and is growing more definitive by the hour). –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Dominica at the 2010 Commonwealth Games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no information on these article, that cannot be found on the 2010 Commonwealth Games article. A redirect would not be helpful either, as other nation articles have content on them. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect both to 2010 Commonwealth Games.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 09:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 15:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 15:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 15:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Procedural: I added some 8 similar articles to this AfD. 103.6.159.74 (talk) 19:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge. While I generally agree with arguments in favor of delete, I feel the best solution would be to merge the per-country-per-year articles into per-country articles (Dominica at the Commonwealth Games, etc.). GregorB (talk) 12:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge. While these articles would be useful if they had more information, if they're going to be one-line stubs indefinitely they might as well be merged to a more general article for now. The titles should be kept regardless, though. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 13:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * They can be expanded. While Dominica at the Commonwealth Games is a one-liner, it is surprising to see that Dominica at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games is a full articele that was once featured as as DYK. 103.6.159.89 (talk) 14:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * comment at least some articles (I did a small sample) are not tagged pointing to this discussion. I ask to tag them, and ask to pace their nominations for deletion which are counting up from a thousand in a week or so. I also ask admins assessing this discussion to count the 7 day discussion period starting only after all articles are tagged. Nabla (talk) 23:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment All articles in this discussion have been tagged now. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Articles with meaningless statistics that will likely never be looked at. Laurdecl talk 09:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge - The statistics are useful, but only in a single article.  Yoshiman6464   ♫🥚 02:22, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to the main articles, preserve info, avoid multiple stubs. Montanabw (talk) 08:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero information or content provided by these pages, so no merge is necessary. Just seems like an attempt by an editor to create lots of pages. Clearly unnecessary, as the fact that these countries attended the Commonwealth games is already covered on the main Commonwealth page. FuriouslySerene (talk) 08:28, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Normally, I'd be looking for a reason to invoke WP:ATD, but I looked at every one of these; not one had any useful content, so there's nothing to merge, and the titles aren't even useful search terms, so redirects seem kind of pointless (but, redirects are cheap, so if somebody really wants the redirects, meh).  -- RoySmith (talk) 21:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per WP:NOTSTATS. Proliferation of sports statistics cruft that's best left to dedicated databases. Renata (talk) 02:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.