Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominik von Einsiedel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 03:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Dominik von Einsiedel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG under any of the purported categories given. As rhetor and philosopher, under WP:ACADEMIC he appears not to have secured a degree, further qualification being late discussions in his pub. As a restaurateur he "ran a pub" and "wanted to open a club, which would have been a success". Per WP:SPORTCRIT there is no indication of participation in major competition and the notability of the amateur sport club he founded is not established. As far as I can tell there is no article at the German Wikipedia giving additional support of notability, neither as an individual or in ventures in which he was involved. The edit summary removing my WP:PROD, by the page creator, that "The person is relevant as a grandgrandson of Otto von Bismarck, although he is perceived to appear as non-notable as philosopher, sportsman or restaurateur." does not pertain per WP:NOTINHERITED. Mutt Lunker (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  16:08, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  16:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mutt Lunker (talk) 16:21, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mutt Lunker (talk) 16:21, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete: Claims of notability are for a university drop-out that ran a pub and played amateur futsal/football, that all fails WP:GNG. Having a great-great-grandfather isn't also a reason for notability (we all have eight of them). The author seems to have problems with WP:NPOV when it comes to articles about related people or himself. --Ben Ben (talk) 16:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 17:29, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's possible to be notable while having done nothing of significance, under WP:GNG, and the Tagblatt article really does have non-trivial and reliably published coverage of the subject. But by itself I don't think it's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete He doesn't appear to meet any notability standards, including GNG.204.126.132.231 (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.