Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominion Ruler Church of Universal Triumph, Dominion of God


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Church of Universal Triumph, Dominion of God. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Dominion Ruler Church of Universal Triumph, Dominion of God

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I'm not entirely convinced that the church itself is notable, it certainly dosen't have much coverage in the media, but this position certainly isn't. The article should be merged into Church of Universal Triumph, Dominion of God.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  06:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 06:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

I vote that this article should not be deleted.This church and its leaders have great significance in chronicling the development and the expression of the afro-american religious subculture in the the urban United states of America.The United States of America is an important country and its subcultures are of great interest to the global community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adawablk (talk • contribs) 21:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:SOFIXIT.  Unscintillating (talk) 07:22, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I think both articles should be deleted, so my version of 'fixing it' would probably not please anyone.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  16:20, 13 May 2012 (UTC)Adawablk (talk) 21:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge with Church of Universal Triumph, Dominion of God. Keristrasza (talk) 15:05, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge with Church of Universal Triumph, Dominion of God. I cannot tell much of the church from the article, except that the ministers ("rulers") appear to have conferred a very exalted status on themselves.  If the church is notable (of which I am uncertain), we certainly do not need a separate list article on its ministers.  Peterkingiron (talk) 11:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.