Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominique Guinard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After two full re-listings, no consensus for a particular outcome has occurred in this discussion. North America1000 12:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Dominique Guinard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient notability. Supposed IOT leader, but no evidence offered. One amongst many. scope_creep (talk) 21:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Marginal keep. GS h-index of 28 may be just enough to pass WP:Prof in very high cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete as the highest citations are only 474, not nearly enough to be genuine significance. SwisterTwister   talk  23:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment How is the h-index generated. It is interesting that a scientific approach is being taken to Afd. scope_creep (talk) 01:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as spam: "... a long hands-on experience in building the Internet of Things both in the cloud..." (wow). The subject is not remarkable enough to overcome the promotionalism. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment The page talks about me (but no I did not write it). I did remove facts that were wrong and the promotionalism I disagreed with. I also added sources. I would of course understand a deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.172.154.138 (talk) 16:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Marginal keep. Listed in Postscapes IoT Top Blogs and Experts (top 10) http://www.postscapes.com/top-100-thinkers-tracking-the-internet-of-things/?page=2#influencers Busybi (talk) 17:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Ten publications with over 100 citations each should be enough for WP:PROF, even in a high-citation field. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.