Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominique Piek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that the subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources - this argument having been made with considerably more substance than the suggestion that the subject is notable for meeting WP:ENT. Mkativerata (talk) 01:25, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Dominique Piek

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Non notable model. Some covers, some works, just that. Damiens .rf 13:10, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 15:17, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per here.   Mbinebri   talk &larr; 01:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per Mbinebri. - The Bushranger Return fire Flank speed 00:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Question. Mbinebri writes above "keep per here". And what's "here"? Right here: I'd say the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue annually receives so much coverage when it comes out that appearing in it as a model should confer notability, per criteria #1 of WP:ENT. There are few things a model can do that increases their public profile as much as this gig. If appearance in this thing brings coverage, then we can expect coverage. So where is this coverage? -- Hoary (talk) 12:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Despite the slavish attention paid by newspapers to fashion and modeling (perhaps not unrelated to advertising revenue), Piek gets a grand total of one (1) hit at Google News. Here it is. You don't have to be able to read Chinese in order to see that it's a mere mention. And despite what's suggested in this AfD and in other AfDs, the "Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue" does not receive much coverage in the infotainment industry. (See my comment in the AfD of Damaris Lewis for more about this.) -- Hoary (talk) 01:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Wrongo! I might have guessed it, the Sports Illustrated bikini bonanza does get piles of attention in what passes for the fourth estate. -- Hoary (talk) 00:11, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  —Hoary (talk) 00:11, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Google News now gives me a grand total of one (1) hit, but it's a different one from the one I got before. This time, some gossip website tells me that Piek is "the supermodel girlfriend of Texas Rangers pitcher, C.J. Wilson". And that's all it says about her. -- Hoary (talk) 00:11, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoary points out. a lack of coverage in reliable sources. LibStar (talk) 07:39, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: what little coverage there is seems to be thoroughly WP:TABLOID. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 11:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.