Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominus Vobiscum: Marriage and Family Retreat Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Daniel Cere. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:51, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Dominus Vobiscum: Marriage and Family Retreat Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet inclusion criteria per Notability_(organizations_and_companies). Most references are not related to the specific organization, and/or do not support the statements (such as the film set reference)    Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)     12:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  —     Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)     13:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - editor who created this article also added an 'other uses' section to Dominus vobiscum. I added a comment to the talk page, then removed the new section.  Editor added it back without discussion. (editor joined discussion soon afterwards)      Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)     14:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * My mistake... 'other uses' section was not newly added to the Dominus vobiscum article.     Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)     14:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


 * You're correct about the source for the film set; it does not mention the filming location. However, the organization has been given attention by a prominent Montreal newspaper, the Montreal Gazette. The newspaper is recognized across Canada. Is this an adequate source? Even if the organization does not deserve its own article, I think it is notable enough to be mentioned on the Dominus vobiscum page. What do you think? Thanks. Steamlunch (talk) 15:43, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: The mentions in the Gazette both mention the Retreat only as part of a larger article listing a number of other retreats--that is, the coverage there does not meet the standard of "significant" coverage required in WP:GNG. The other two sources don't help, as one is not reliable (#3) and one doesn't mention the article subject (#4).  Unless more sources can be found (a Google News search didn't turn up anything useful for me) that are reliable and cover the source significantly, the article should be deleted.  Qwyrxian (talk) 16:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to (founder) Daniel Cere. The best source has only four short paragraphs about the center, and the others are almost worthless in terms of complying with WP:ORG.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.