Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domou Amro (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus is sourcing is not at the quality required for notability Star   Mississippi  00:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Domou Amro
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORTS, but does pass WP:NBADMINTON. GNG takes precedence in this case. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Jordan. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep has significant coverage in reliable sources, hence passes General Notability Guideline. zoglophie 07:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Please cite those sources here. They do not exist. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:17, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep there were 83 results for Domou Amro badminton in Google. Jordan News Stvbastian (talk) 15:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a trivial mention and does not meet GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * In addition, she is the winner of multiple bwf sanctioned tournaments in Africa and Middle East, which itself tells about her notability. Many of the sources which are reliable does have her coverage. I don't know how anyone can call such significant coverage as mere "trivial". And more importantly, before this nomination, you even nominated this article for speedy deletion; what a big joke that was. zoglophie 05:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * As stated in the nom she meets WP:NBADMINTON, but you fail to provide significant and independent coverage as per GNG. You have failed on multiple requests to provide independent and significant coverage. Just saying it does not mean its true. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 08:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I can only find trivial mentions and database entries 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 06:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * many of the sources used for references are notable in nature. I'm not obligated to put them up here, I have already done so in the article. See the article yourself. zoglophie 05:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * None of which meet WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.