Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domus Teofilo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Teofilo Camomot. Merging permitted to any sourced content. Spartaz Humbug! 08:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Domus Teofilo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It is unclear what exactly this is, but presumably a crypt of an archbishop. No indication of independent notability per WP:GNG; the gravesite can be covered in the article about the bishop, Teofilo Camomot. Contested PROD.  Sandstein  08:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 08:27, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 08:27, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge -- I am also not sure what it is about, but I do not think we need two articles, Teofilo Camomot and this. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:06, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dial911 (talk) 01:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If it helps, the Domus Teofilo is also called the House of Teofilo museum, there is a shrine inside it, and in that shrine is a image of Teofilo Camomot. Teofilo is an important archbishop that may be made a saint. The tomb itself was nearby, and Teofilo will be reburied somewhere else after his remains have been displayed in the museum. The museum contains other relics as well. Most of this information is from this source. Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 14:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep notable museum and shrine. Distinct from the religious figure entombed there at the moment. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Teofilo Camomot; not independently notable. Per one usable source listed in the article, Domus is the museum dedicated to the life of the subject:
 * The remains were then placed at the center of the chapel inside the museum, which houses his personal belongings and writings, for public viewing until Thursday afternoon. These were interred shortly after.
 * Since the museum addresses the life of the subject, it's appropriate to include it in the article on the subject. There's no need for two separate articles. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Teofilo Camomot, per the arguments above. Limited sourcing also suggests a standalone article isn't warranted. Not sure what to do with that massive infobox, though. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  19:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.