Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Be A Tourist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 09:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Don&

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence for encyclopedic notability (see WP:COMPANY). The article spends a lot of time praising the virtues of this young company, but fails to mention any "hard facts" like the number of employees, revenue or profits. High on a tree (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsourced and unsourceable, likely conflict of interest, spammy. Doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP. -- Kinu t /c  05:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Quite possibly a WP:COI, a lot of promotional material and appears not to satisfy WP:CORP.  a s e nine  say what?  06:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this article, which is currently spam. Notability could be established later, but hasn't been as of yet. Frank  |  talk  12:23, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - notability not established. A vanity page, perhaps? Merenta (talk) 14:23, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Since this is blatant advertising with no third party sources, I want a speedy delete. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 02:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Very few Google results. —  Wen li  (reply here) 02:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.