Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Call Me Marshall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 18:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Don't Call Me Marshall

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a bootleg compilation that was not released by Eminem. As such, it does not meet the notability guidelines for music. It has no sources, very little editing activity, and very few articles link to it. Croctotheface 07:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Because the CD is unofficial there is no set tracklisting and often other tracks are added, taken away, or swapped around." So basically it's the unofficial official title for anyone's home-made Eminem compilation? No dice. tomasz.  07:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a loosely collected bootleg that can't possibly be verified. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. An over arching name for any Eminen bootleg compilation is not notable unless it has become a much dicussed topic. If someone can provide a reliable source describing the phenomenon of a single title becoming the default name of a bootleg, and rewrites the article to show this, I'll reconsider. Nuttah68 11:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * To be fair to an article I believe should be deleted, I think that the track listing is at least somewhat consistent. That is, I don't think this is the title for ANY Eminem bootleg, and any different "version" could still be recognizable as the same title.  However, I do not believe that this bootleg has been the subject of the kind of sources necessary to merit a WP article.  Croctotheface 11:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. An over arching name for a inconsistent Eminen bootleg compilation is not notable unless it has become a much dicussed topic. If someone can provide a reliable source describing the phenomenon of a single title becoming the default name of a number of varying bootlegs, and rewrites the article to show this, I'll reconsider. Nuttah68 11:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.