Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Matter to Me


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The snow's coming down hard. (non-admin closure) SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 12:44, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Don't Matter to Me

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No extra information warranting its own article. Just a repeat of what's on the main album's page. [[User:TomasTomasTomas|⠀𝗧𝗢𝗠𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗠𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗠𝗔𝗦 ]]⠀[[User talk:TomasTomasTomas|𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗞⠀ ]] 02:30, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. TomasTomasTomas, there's no reason for the article to be deleted. Regardless of whether it fails the guidelines for Notability. It can simply be blanked and turned into a redirect. If it is a non-notable song off an album, then the article can be turned into a "Redirect" (in this case, it can be redirected to "Scorpion (Drake album)"). Like the template says above while editing this page, "When discussing an article, remember to consider alternatives to deletion." I will be adding the template for Notability onto the article. DovahDuck (talk) 02:56, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. I would also like to mention that the album in which the song is a part of, was just recently released. In a week, "Don't Matter to Me" is going to be covered by various news outlets due to how it's set to become the the highest charting Michael Jackson song since "Love Never Felt So Good", and that's not even mentioning the fact that the track has already been mentioned and covered by various media outlets already. Although the article does needs some expansion, that will happen overtime and I'm already working on that issue.DovahDuck (talk) 03:38, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. Another thing that I would like to mention is that the song is set to be released as its album's fifth single on July 10, 2018.DovahDuck (talk) 23:18, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Keep The song is already reached number one in different countries i tunes and spotify chart;and current at #3 on I tune ww chart.And this song set to become Michael Jacksons highest charting song since Love never felt so good.The track has already been mentioned and covered by various media outlets and its meets WP:GNG.Give it some time. Also see Wikipedia:not before. Akhiljaxxn 03:49, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment iTunes doesn't have a WW chart. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 04:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Keep Per above comments. Awardmaniac (talk) 12:56, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep receiving coverage from multiple independent sources. Tillerh11 (talk) 14:16, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep #1 on iTunes in most countries. Highest charting M.J. song in a while, also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ultimograph5 (talk • contribs) 23:52, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * iTunes chart is not a valid factor WP:BADCHARTS. Only official charts. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 04:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Keep Hurrygane (talk) 23:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep While this might be WP:TOOSOON since the song has not charted in any countries yet and may not meet the three criterion of WP:NSONG yet, the song has received a lot of attention in the news (about 3,560,000 results on Google) and therefore can be a standalone article. On a side note, sources (including Official Charts), indicate that this song in addition to other Drake songs in the album will chart after this week's tracking period; it will likely be notable for its own article next week. —SomeoneNamedDerek (talk) 05:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Will inevitably land on a chart, and using MJ vocals would have clinched this as an automatic keep in most senses. It might be only on BADCHARTS now, but WP:UCS should outweigh that here.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 08:26, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep will be released as a single, and (most likely) will chart on the top 20 of The Hot 100. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 00:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - while theorizing as to whether or not something will chart in the future might be construed as WP:CRYSTAL, which would warrant a redirect, the use of MJ's vocals makes this notable.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep – Such a ridiculous deletion request since it is doing so well on charts around the world. JE98 (talk) 16:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per above \\\Septrillion:- &#8237;  10 Eleventeen 08:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per independent coverage outside of album reviews from Deccan Herald and Spin (especially the former), which is enough to satisfy WP:Notability (music). Charts (or lack thereof) aren't definitive indicators on whether a song warrants its own page, though, and neither are single releases or artists involved. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:13, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. There's a clear consensus here, can we archive already? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:37, 7 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.